Obama meets Hillary Clinton at White House




View – https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton






WASHINGTON  |  2015-03-24 10:36:54


Obama meets

Hillary Clinton

at White House


By Guan Jianwu



U.S. President Barack Obama hosted Hillary Clinton privately at the White House on Monday of March 23 and discussed “a range of topics,” the White House said.

The meeting last about an hour, and they “enjoy catching up in person when their schedules permit,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said.

After the White House meeting, Clinton posted a message on Twitter praising Obama’s health care law and its provisions aimed at covering young people and those with pre-existing conditions.

She wrote: “Women get better coverage. Repeal those things? Embrace them!” The words seem to aim at the Republicans who want to get rid of the law.

The tweet has also attached an old photo of Clinton and Obama hugging.

Clinton has recently been under fire for revelations that she did not use an official email account when she was secretary of state. Instead, she dealt with daily business on a private account exclusively. The Clinton team also set up her own email server to fully control who could have the access to those emails.

The exposure of Clinton closely guarding her emails posed not only a public relations crisis for a promising Democratic presidential candidate for the 2016 elections, but also a possible legal investigation into whether her practice had broken laws.

In a recent CNN/ORC poll, party support for potential Democratic candidates was predominately focused on Hillary Clinton with a rate of 62 percent. She was also found to beat all the major potential Republican rivals in a hypothetical general election.







WASHINGTON  |  2015-03-24 10:31:03


Hillary has decided advantage

as more women will vote in 2016 elections


By Zhi Linfei



The likely 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s status as the only female contender in the race for the White House gives her a decided advantage over other candidates, as more women than men are expected to vote, U.S. experts said.

The former first lady, secretary of state and senator carries much weight with American women, being seen as perhaps the first woman candidate with a serious chance of winning the 2016 race to the White House. Many American women would view that as a victory for all women nationwide, as well as the issues they hold dear.

“Clinton’s gender will be an advantage because more women than men vote,” Brookings Institution’s senior fellow Darrell West told Xinhua, “Women have become very active politically and they want to see their issues addressed.”

Still, Clinton cannot depend solely on her gender to win the elections, and many experts, pundits and political soothsayers say she must avoid depending too much on her gender to gain votes.

Indeed, Clinton will have to appeal to a much broader pool of voters if she hopes to clinch the White House in 2016. Her best bet is to take advantage of her unique status of being female, but seek to demonstrate why she has the leadership ability and vision to be an effective president, experts said.

Clinton in recent weeks has been embroiled in controversy, and questions remain over her sole use of a private server and email account to conduct business while in office.

The New York Times revealed recently that Clinton solely used a private email account to conduct business during her tenure as secretary of state, and kept a private server at her residence. It sparked a wave of controversy and myriad questions, such as whether she sent any classified information through the account.

But the controversy is likely to fade into the background as election season gets fully under way, because Clinton will likely stonewall reporters, who in turn will forget about the controversy and move on to the next news of the day, opponents contend.

But while the issue in and of itself is unlikely to derail her campaign, Republicans are likely to add it to their narrative of what they label an untrustworthy and secretive Clinton who, they say, believes the rules do not apply to her.

Foreign policy is expected to be a major issue in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, and that may spell trouble for Clinton, as critics will view her as tainted by the White House’s perceived foreign policy missteps.

As a former secretary of state under President Barack Obama, Clinton spurred controversy for what critics billed as not being forthcoming on the details surrounding the 2012 attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed the U.S. ambassador.

Moreover, with the administration now coming under fire for putting the threat of the Islamic State — a radical terror group in Iraq and Syria — on the backburner until the situation boiled over, Clinton could be viewed as lacking foresight on major foreign policy issues.

Still, those are complex issues that will be lost on most voters, as what political scientists call “low information voters” — those poorly informed or misinformed about politics — tend to cast the most votes in U.S. presidential elections. Pundits say Republicans will have to simplify those issues into terms that resonate with average U.S. voters.










  1. I’m gone to inform my little brother, that he should also pay a visit this website on regular
    basis to get updated from most up-to-date gossip.

  2. Hi there, You have done an incredible job. I will certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends.
    I’m sure they will be benefited from this site.

  3. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this write-up plus the rest of the site is extremely

  4. Santiago wrote:

    Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to
    assert that I get in fact enjoyed account your blog posts.
    Any way I’ll be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement
    you access consistently fast.

  5. Adam wrote:

    Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.
    I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful
    info. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.

  6. Charlie wrote:

    My spouse and I stumbled over here different web address and thought
    I might as well check things out. I like what
    I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to exploring your web page
    yet again.

  7. Louis wrote:

    My programmer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses.
    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on a number of websites for
    about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform.
    I have heard excellent things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my
    wordpress content into it? Any help would be really appreciated!

  8. masturbando wrote:

    I just could not depart your web site prior to suggesting that
    I actually enjoyed the standard info an individual supply for your visitors?

    Is going to be back incessantly to inspect new posts

  9. Marcelino wrote:

    Aw, this was an extremely good post. Spending some time and actual effort to create a good article… but what can I say… I put things off a lot and never manage
    to get nearly anything done.

  10. Emery wrote:

    Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came to look it over.
    I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m
    bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and fantastic design and style.

  11. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is important and everything.
    However just imagine if you added some great pictures or
    video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!

    Your content is excellent but with images and videos, this website could undeniably be one of the very best in its field.
    Great blog!

  12. Kendra wrote:

    Great items from you, man. I’ve have in mind your stuff prior to and you are just too fantastic.

    I really like what you’ve received here, certainly like what you are
    saying and the way in which through which you say it.
    You’re making it enjoyable and you still take care of to stay it smart.
    I can not wait to learn far more from you. That is really a terrific web site.

  13. I’d like to find out more? I’d love to find out more details.

  14. Latanya wrote:

    Somebody essentially help to make critically posts I’d state.
    This is the very first time I frequented your website page and to this point?

    I amazed with the analysis you made to make this particular submit
    extraordinary. Excellent activity!

  15. hotmail sign wrote:

    I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right
    here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.

    nonetheless, you command get got an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following.
    unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly
    the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.

  16. Michelle wrote:

    Now it is time to decide your particular investments.

  17. jasa retweet wrote:

    Valuable info. Lucky me I found your website by chance,
    and I’m shocked why this coincidence did not came about in advance!

    I bookmarked it.

  18. Keri wrote:

    All forms of investments include sure dangers.

  19. Tegan wrote:

    Consider investments that provide immediate annuities.

  20. Fletcher wrote:

    A monetary advisor is your planning accomplice.

Leave a Reply