Samsung, LG fined for LCD panel price-rigging


By Xinhua


Samsung, LG and four Taiwanese firms have been fined heavily for price-fixing of liquid crystal display (LCD) panels on the Chinese mainland.

These companies have been ordered to pay 144 million yuan in fines and return 172 million yuan of extra payment to Chinese mainland buyers. The government also confiscated 36.75 million yuan of their illegal gains, China’s top price regulator said on January 4.

The four firms from Taiwan are Chi Mei Optoelectronics, AU Optronics, Chunghwa Picture Tubes and HannStar Display.

The six companies were fined for price-rigging on the Chinese mainland between 2001 and 2006, according to the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC).

The NDRC launched an investigation after receiving multiple complaints since Dec. 2006 about price-fixing involving the six companies.

During the investigation, the firms confessed that they held 53 meetings between 2001 and 2006 to fix the prices of flat panels supplied to the Chinese mainland market. This harmed the interests of both other LCD panel suppliers and consumers, according to the NDRC.

LCD panels accounted for about 80 percent of the production cost of color TVs during the 2001-2006 period. More recently, the rate is around 70 percent, according to NDRC data.

The 172 million yuan that was illegally obtained from Chinese television manufacturers has now been reimbursed to these companies, said the NDRC.

The six companies also vowed to extend the free warranty period of their LCD panels for TV producers on the Chinese mainland from 18 months to 36 months, which could save manufacturers 395 million yuan each year on maintenance costs, the NDRC added.

Up until recent years, TV manufacturers on the mainland have suffered from their reliance on LCD panel imports, as the core technology of LCD production has been kept among LCD panel suppliers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan.

“The NDRC’s move will help establish a fair market,” said Bai Weimin, vice president of the China Video Industry Association.

TV producers on the mainland have always hoped for fair treatment from overseas LCD panel suppliers, whose products now cover nearly half of the global LCD TV output, said Bai.

Meanwhile, Chinese netizens voiced their support for the commission’s firm stance.

“It may shock all the foreign-funded companies in China running against Chinese laws and regulations,” said a netizen on Friday in a post at the Twitter-like Sina Weibo.

“All the domestic TV makers could do nothing but accept the prices those giants fixed, which impacts the industry,” said a user with the screen name “Fanrenyanzhongkanshjie”.

However, some online comments showed their dissatisfaction, saying the fine could not be compared to that levied by the United States and the European Union on companies for similar deeds, which amounted to about 1 billion U.S. dollars.

“The fine means very little for them,” “Donghuahudegui” posted.

The amount of the fine was made based on the companies’ illegal income and was in accordance with the Pricing Law of China, the NDRC said. It also took their confession into consideration.

Others thought what matters is the penalty itself, not the exact fine.

“The incident is a milestone for Chinese market regulators who will act hard if anyone plays against rules,” said Prof. Wu Hong, Dean of School of Economic Laws under East China University of Political Science and Law.



  1. Wow! Thank you! I permanently wanted to write on my sige something like that.
    Can I take a fragment of your post to my website?;u=224190

  2. This is very attention-grabbing,You are a very professional
    blogger. I have joined your feed and stay up for in the hunt for more of your magnifiocent post.
    Additionally, I’ve shared your website in my socxial networks;u=148343

  3. I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog.

    Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?

    Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a great
    blog like this one these days.

  4. Kristen wrote:

    The trapped air between the inside as well as outside doorway may be a variable in door closing.

  5. Hi, i think that i saw you visited my weblogg so i caqme tto ?return the want?.I am attempting to tto find issues
    to enhance my site!I suppose its good enough to use a few of your ideas!!

  6. What’s up to every single one, it’s actually a fastidious for me to pay
    a visit tyis web site, it includes priceless Information.

    Here is my web site Yerli dizi izle

  7. la propreté générale de l’environnement peut affecter votre santé,
    ainsi que celle de votre entourage.

    C’est pourquoi un entretien soigné et régulier est nécessaire pour assurer efficacement la salubrité optimale du domicile ou de l’espace
    de travail. Basée à Montréal, G.E.M Ménage est une compagnie phare intervenant dans le secteur du nettoyage
    et de l’entretien commercial et résidentiel. Hautement qualifiés,
    les professionnels de G.E.M. garantissent un environnement
    propre et sain au domicile comme au bureau avec des services performants tels que par exemple,
    l’époussetage, l’utilisation d’aspirateur, le nettoyage et
    désinfection de salles de bain ou cuisines et autres tâches générales

  8. Highly descriptive blog, I loved that bit. Will there be a part

  9. Thank you for sharing your info. I truly appreciate your efforts and
    I will be waiting for your next write ups thank you once again.

  10. Great article, just what I was looking for.

  11. a wrote:

    I will immediately grab your rss as I can’t find your email subscription link or e-newsletter service.
    Do you have any? Kindly allow me know so that
    I may subscribe. Thanks.

  12. SBLC leasing wrote:

    What’s up colleagues, its wonderful article concerning teachingand entirely explained,
    keep it up all the time.

Leave a Reply